0.11/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.11/0.14	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.14/0.35	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.14/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.35	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.35	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.35	% CPULimit   : 960
0.14/0.35	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.35	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:59:01 EDT 2022
0.14/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.48	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.21/0.49	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.21/0.49	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.21/0.50	# partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# full_lambda_6 with pid 23979 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by full_lambda_6
0.21/0.50	# partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.21/0.50	# ...ProofStateSinE()=46/90
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGHNF-FFMM11-SHFFFFBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(2): HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# new_ho_10 with pid 23983 completed with status 0
0.21/0.50	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.21/0.50	# partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNHFA.
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.21/0.50	# ...ProofStateSinE()=46/90
0.21/0.50	# Search class: HGHNF-FFMM11-SHFFFFBN
0.21/0.50	# partial match(2): HGHSF-FFMM21-SHFFFFBN
0.21/0.50	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.21/0.50	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.21/0.50	# Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
0.21/0.50	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# Proof found!
0.21/0.50	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.50	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_22, type, agent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_23, type, attribute_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_24, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_25, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiooIiioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_26, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_27, type, equal_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_28, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_29, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIIiioIIiioIoIioI: (($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_30, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_31, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_32, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_33, type, knows_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_34, type, lAgent_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_35, type, lAsymmetricRelation_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_36, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_37, type, lBinaryPredicate_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_38, type, lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_39, type, lCognitiveAgent_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_40, type, lFormula_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_41, type, lHuman_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_42, type, lIntentionalProcess_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_43, type, lMary_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_44, type, lObject_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_45, type, lOrganism_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_46, type, lOrganization_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_47, type, lProcess_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_48, type, lSelfConnectedObject_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_49, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_50, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_51, type, member_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_52, type, n1_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_53, type, n2_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_54, type, part_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_55, type, patient_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_56, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_57, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_58, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_59, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_60, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_61, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_62, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_63, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_64, type, esk3_1: $i > $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(decl_65, type, esk4_1: $i > $i).
0.21/0.50	thf(con, conjecture, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax_016, axiom, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (((lChris_THFTYPE_i)=(lChris_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_016)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax_017, axiom, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (![X19:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X19)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X19))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_017)).
0.21/0.50	thf(ax_006, axiom, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax_006)).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_5, axiom, ((((lChris_THFTYPE_i)!=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(((lChris_THFTYPE_i)=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_016])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_6, axiom, ((~(![X19:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X19)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X19))))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(![X19:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X19)=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X19)))|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_017])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)|~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true)))|((lChris_THFTYPE_i)!=(lChris_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X56:$i]:(((((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true)))&(~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X56)|(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X56)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $false)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (~($true))))|~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_11, plain, (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (($true))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)|(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (~($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (~($true)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_11])])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_17, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_006])).
0.21/0.50	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.50	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.50	# Parsed axioms                        : 90
0.21/0.50	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 44
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses                      : 62
0.21/0.50	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
0.21/0.50	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 54
0.21/0.50	# Processed clauses                    : 63
0.21/0.50	# ...of these trivial                  : 6
0.21/0.50	# ...subsumed                          : 4
0.21/0.50	# ...remaining for further processing  : 53
0.21/0.50	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.21/0.50	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.21/0.50	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.21/0.50	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.21/0.50	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.50	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.21/0.50	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.21/0.50	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.50	# NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.50	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.21/0.50	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.50	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.50	# Current number of processed clauses  : 9
0.21/0.50	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.21/0.50	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.50	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.21/0.50	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.21/0.50	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35
0.21/0.50	# ...number of literals in the above   : 52
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.50	# Current number of archived clauses   : 44
0.21/0.50	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21
0.21/0.50	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
0.21/0.50	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
0.21/0.50	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
0.21/0.50	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.21/0.50	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.21/0.50	# Condensation attempts                : 63
0.21/0.50	# Condensation successes               : 1
0.21/0.50	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 3044
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.011 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1928 pages
0.21/0.50	
0.21/0.50	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.50	# User time                : 0.010 s
0.21/0.50	# System time              : 0.006 s
0.21/0.50	# Total time               : 0.015 s
0.21/0.50	# Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
0.21/0.50	EOF